Uncategorized

CSULB pays to keep student cars off streets

While students pay to park on campus, Cal State Long Beach pays to keep students from parking on residential streets.

Patrick O’Donnell, the fourth district council member of Long Beach, said the university agreed to pay up to $12,000 this year for preferential parking permits on the streets close to campus.

According to O’Donnell, the money comes from campus parking citations. O’Donnell said he was going to advocate for more money

Preferential parking – or one-to-two hour parking except with a permit – is enforced on several streets in neighborhoods surrounding the CSULB campus. The permits cost $32 each every year, and households may purchase as many as four. Residents in the Los Altos neighborhood pay $16 for the first two permits and $32 for the second two because of the money from CSULB.

According to Roseman, there are still about 300 permits available at the discounted rate. People who do not live on restricted streets cannot purchase permits.

Last night the local community members who live in the Los Altos neighborhood met last night with O’Donnell to discuss students parking on residential streets.

According to O’Donnell, this was an issue brought up at the last community meeting.

“I know you know there’s a problem,” O’Donnell said.

To fix the problem, David Roseman, a city traffic engineer, proposed increasing preferential parking boundaries. This would force students to park further away.

“We’re always guessing how far the student will travel,” Roseman said. “What’s it worth to him?”

When people who live beyond the proposed additions claimed to also have a student-parking problem, Roseman said they would consider expanding even more.

Many of the people at the meeting felt that the students parking on residential streets was a serious issue that needs to be addressed quickly. Some complaints from the community include students leaving trash outside their cars, moving garbage cans in order to park, partially blocking driveways and parking uncomfortably close to other cars on the street making it difficult for residents to safely pull out of their parking spot.

One community member said, “You need to get CSULB to make the students park there.” Others echoed that sentiment, asking why, if the $123 parking fee is so daunting to students, the university doesn’t include it in tuition so students don’t realize how much they are paying to park. O’Donnell said that state law prohibits the school from charging anything but tuition to students.

Some people asked why students have to pay for parking at all, since if it were free students would park on campus and not on the streets, but University Police Captain Fernando Solorzano said that the parking fee students pay, pays for the maintenance of the parking facilities on campus. One person asked if the school is paying to maintain its parking facilities, why isn’t the school paying to maintain the neighborhood streets that students park on.

Community members also wanted to know why if parking was free at the Marina Lot, the school isn’t still encouraging to park there. Solorzano replied that since Parking Structure 3 has opened, there hasn’t been a need for the Marina Lot. Solorzano also mentioned the school’s alternative transportation programs including U-Pass and carpool parking spaces. The residents still want the school to promote the Marina Lot in an effort to keep students off their streets.

Another proposal was made to include weekends into the preferential parking restrictions to prevent students who live in on campus from parking there. Some residents claimed to see students park on the neighborhood street and walk to the residential halls.

While most of those in attendance felt that expanding preferential parking was a good thing, a small minority spoke up for the students. They said that they didn’t feel it was a problem and students should have the right to park on public streets.

Before any change can be made to which streets have preferential parking, Roseman said that they need two-thirds of the neighborhood supporting it so they can take it to the council. From there the council will vote on it. If everything goes smoothly, the new restrictions can be set before the fall semester begins.

You may also like

6 Comments

  1. CSULB is the third highest employer in the city. The combination of employees, faculty, students and administrators comprises nearly 10 % of the entire city population. Many employees and faculty live in Patrick O’Donnell’s District 4. Residents in nearby neighborhoods WITHOUT preferred parking permits illegally put up signs barring student parking at the beginning of the semester. I think O’Donnell and the area residents better realize who butters their bread. If his plan comes through, I also think students should boycott of ALL businesses in District 4 and ALL of CSULB’s on-campus entities. It’s time to stop treating students like the proverbial cash cow.

  2. As a taxpayer AND a student who pays for parking permits each semester, I feel like the city is double-dipping. O’Donnell is a bum, LBSU Alum. I remember him being the spearhead that didn’t want the city to pay its share for the lights on Bellflower. That was a serious safety issue. One woman got raped on that dark stretch, but O’Donnell didn’t care. Hopefully, the people in his district — many of them faculty and employees at CSULB — will give him the heave ho. Making students who don’t drive pay for parking permits? This campus is getting less affordable with each passing breath. Luxury fees (Recreation Center and the athletic referendum) piled on top of tuition increases will most likely reach @$1,000 more per year than they do now. The new state budget will include new taxes for gas and vehicle registration. O’Donnell should place his hands firmly over his lips.

  3. O Donnel is a bum. The rest of the city gets along with the university very well. Never forget he is the one who stopped the city from putting up lights on bellflower (not even his district) and gave the money to snow day, at a park in his neighborhood I might add. He rather use the money for pork for his district than promote safety. Fortunately, the rest of the council saw through his crap and voted to put the lights up a few months later. Never forget what he did. This should be his last elected office.

  4. I purchase my parking permit every semester, I am lucky to have the ability to pay the $123. That doesn’t go for everyone though, another option would be to lower the cost of the parking permit. Make it more affordable to students.

  5. I was one of the small minority that spoke out in support of free parking on PUBLIC streets for students. I hope the students read this and take action. Students have as much a right to park on the streets as homeowners and their guests.

  6. To include parking in the tutition of students would be unethical beyond reproach. What about the students living in the dorms, the ones taking the bus, etc.? Why should they have to pay money for parking? The marina lot is nice, but $18,700 a month to run a shuttle for 14 hours, 16 days a month there is a stiff fee to pay compared to $12,000 for these residential permits.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *